That would suffice judicially.
Mosaic law build a railing around your roof.
Deuteronomy 22 8 nlt when you build a new house you must build a railing around the edge of its flat roof.
The critical point is this.
In new york city roofs balconies or terraces with slope of 2 4 12 or less and height of 22 feet or greater require railings per 2014 nyc building code section 1509 8.
That way you will not be considered guilty of murder if someone falls from the roof.
Therefore if he fell was he ultimately responsible for his injury or death and no crime had been committed.
That certainly seems like a moral issue yet i don t see too many roof fences around.
Someone who went onto a roof that did not have a rail did so of their own free will and chose to take the risk.
That way you will not be considered guilty of murder if someone falls from the roof.
But what about that law from deuteronomy 22 8 that says you must build a fence around your roof so you re not guilty of bloodshed if someone falls off.
Tucked away in the middle of the mosaic law is of all things the following building code.
But if he refused to build a railing and no one fell off that was his decision.
A wall built around an existing roof old house would not have integrity with the house and be weak.
Since people in that culture spent time on their flat roofs falling off a roof was a potential danger.
There was no system of fines to the civil government under the mosaic law.
Deuteronomy 22 8 nlt when you build a new house you must build a railing around the edge of its flat roof.
The barrier onto the roof was the judicial equivalent of a railing.
When thou buildest a new house then thou shalt make a battlement for thy roof that thou bring not blood upon thine house if any man fall from thence.
This case law applies the principle enunciated by the sixth.
The only money collected by judges was for restitution to victims.
He could place a barrier to access to the roof.
People do not spend time on slanted roofs however or the roofs of grass huts so that law does not apply everywhere.
On the one hand yes do not murder is clearly a moral issue.
There was no crime of failing to build a rail around a roof.
Net bible emphasis mine the moral concept here is integrity.
Instead each property owner had a choice of a not building a rail and risking bloodguilt or b building a rail and avoiding bloodguilt.
An example would be the case law that states when you build a new house you shall make a parapet for your roof.
22 8 if you build a new house you must construct a guard rail around your roof to avoid being culpable in the event someone should fall from it.
So what could have been the civil penalty for failing to build a railing.
Often older buildings may comply with the code under which they were constructed.